Agents for engineering management
Your team already writes down what it did — in commits, in merge requests, in review. An agent reads that history and tells you what actually moved, where work is stuck, and what looks like it will slip. Then you ask it questions.
The first report costs nothing, and the button opens a conversation rather than a form.
1
Say what you want to know
The button opens a conversation, not a form. Ask what this measures and what it needs before you give it anything; an account comes when you want a report of your own.
2
Connect one repository
Through GitHub or GitLab, on their own consent screen, which shows you exactly what is being asked for. Read-only over the code, and one repository is enough to start.
3
It measures the last 30 days
What moved and where, how long changes waited for review, what is being rewritten, and which parts of the codebase only one person has touched. Counted from the history first, written up afterwards.
4
Ask it about what it found
Why a figure is what it is, what a release is waiting on, what one person has been working on. It answers from the same measurements, in the same conversation.
What you can check
An agent reading your repository is something you should be able to verify rather than be told. These three are where you do it.
- It reads, and cannot write
- It cannot push, open a merge request, or change anything in your repository.
- Every finding names its source
- A finding has to point at files you can open or at a figure that was measured. That is a rule in our code, not a line in a prompt: the ones that do not are rejected.
- Every call is on the record
- Anything an agent does outside Superhero is written down before it happens, together with what permitted it. You can read that ledger.
Start with one repository. You will have the first report in a few minutes.